
ATI Radeon HD 4650VSRadeon RX 7400
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 4650

VSWINNERATI Radeon HD 46500%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 7400

性能4446
効率100100
Price / Performance10094
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4446
100100
10094
3468
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDATI Radeon HD 46500No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 74000No verified public setup yet
比較結果
The devices received the same overall score
ATI Radeon HD 4650 leads in combined gaming performance. ATI Radeon HD 4650 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
ATI Radeon HD 4650 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 56–61of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 4650
0 件のいいねHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 4650
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
総合スコア
概要
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44
46Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
40Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
37Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65
65
完全比較
仕様
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP48 WBetter55 W
Clock speed600 MHz1452 - 2300 MHzBetter
Base clock600 MHz1452 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz2300 MHzBetter
VRAM1 GB DDR28 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
VRAM capacity1 GB8 GBBetter
メモリクロック800 МгцBetter10,8 GHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Memory bandwidth12800 GB/sBetter173 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8Better
Power connector--
Power consumption48 WBetter55 W
Process node55 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20082025Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.3848Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
ゲームFPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10044464%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100395432%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100415224%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100346867%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100405633%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100405532%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100415224%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100395839%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100415326%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
基本情報
Architecture——
Process node55 nm6 nm優位
Release date20082025優位
Launch price——
詳細仕様
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock600 MHz1452 MHz優位
Boost clock600 MHz2300 MHz優位
フォームファクターと互換性
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8優位
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM容量とタイプ
VRAM1 GB DDR28 GB GDDR6優位
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6優位
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Memory bandwidth12800 GB/s優位173 GB/s
Memory cache——
接続と出力
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
APIとSDKの互換性
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6その他の比較
レビューと質問
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
比較に関するよくある質問
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4650 or RX 7400?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4650 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 offers more overall performance, while RX 7400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7400 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 4650 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4650 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.

205NVIDIA