GeForce 8300 GSVSGeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce 8300 GS+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
8300 GS
VSWINNER8300 GS0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GTX 1060 6GB
Wydajność3737
Efektywność100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3737
100100
100100
460
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIA8300 GS0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIAGTX 1060 6GB0No verified public setup yet
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA
The devices received the same overall score
8300 GS leads in combined gaming performance. 8300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
8300 GS costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 95–100of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8300 GS
0 polubieńHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8300 GS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OCENA OGÓLNA
Przegląd
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE
Specyfikacja
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed459 MHz1506 - 1708 MHzBetter
Base clock459 MHz1506 MHzBetter
Boost clock459 MHz1708 MHzBetter
VRAM128 MB DDR2Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory typeDDR2GDDR5Better
VRAM capacity128 MBBetter6 GB
Taktowanie pamięci800 MHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter192 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16Better
Power connector-6 pin
Power consumption40 WBetter120 W
TDP40 WBetter120 W
Process node80 nm16 nmBetter
Release date20072016Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.0153.935Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS w grach
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100294441%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100284444%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100460175%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100224874%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100244663%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100284444%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100195090%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100274448%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node80 nm16 nmBetter
Release date20072016Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock459 MHz1506 MHzBetter
Boost clock459 MHz1708 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 3x16Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-6 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM128 MB DDR2Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory typeDDR2GDDR5Better
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter192 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8300 GS or GTX 1060 6GB?+
8300 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8300 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8300 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8300 GS offers more overall performance, while 8300 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8300 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8300 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8300 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8300 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8300 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.