Radeon Pro W6800VSRadeon RX 6550M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Pro W6800+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Pro W6800
VSWINNERPro W68000%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6550M
Wydajność6051
Efektywność80100
Data confidence7560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
6051
80100
SPOŁECZNOŚĆ · ZWERYFIKOWANE DANE
Otwórz konfiguracje streamerów→Sprzęt używany przez streamerów
Prawdziwe publiczne konfiguracje powiązane z każdym urządzeniem.
AMDPro W68000Brak jeszcze zweryfikowanej publicznej konfiguracji
AMDRadeon RX 6550M0Brak jeszcze zweryfikowanej publicznej konfiguracji
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA
The devices received the same overall score
Pro W6800 leads in combined gaming performance. Pro W6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6550M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 83–88of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Pro W6800
0 polubieńHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Pro W6800
54/100 · Price $2499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OCENA OGÓLNA
Przegląd
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
51
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
43
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
80
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62
62
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE
Specyfikacja
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS17.83Better5.816
Max monitors——
TDP250 W80 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Release date20212023-01-04Better
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2Better
Launch price$2499—
Shader units / Cores3840Better1024
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock speed2075 - 2320 MHzBetter2000–2840 MHz
Base clock2075 MHzBetter2000 MHz
Boost clock2320 MHz2840 MHzBetter
Video memory32 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
VRAM capacity32 GBBetter4 GB
Memory clock16 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
Bandwidth512 GB/sBetter144 GB/s
Power consumption250 WBetter80 W
Process node7 nmBetter6 nm
Recommended PSU600 W—
Length267 mm—
Die size520 mm²Better107 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 128 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count26800 millionBetter5400 million
FPS w grach
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10063597%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008010022%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100605116%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node——
Release date——
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock——
Boost clock——
Form factor and compatibility
Interface——
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector——
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM——
Memory type——
Memory bus——
Memory bandwidth——
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
WYJAŚNIENIE AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Wyjaśnij to porównanie
Nie tylko procenty: przyczyny, istotne specyfikacje i praktyczny wpływ każdego wykresu.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
PRAWDZIWE KONFIGURACJE
Doświadczenia właścicieli
Prawdziwe zestawy, wyniki i opinie społeczności.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Pro W6800 or Radeon RX 6550M?+
Pro W6800 has the higher overall gaming score, while Pro W6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Pro W6800 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Pro W6800 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Pro W6800 offers more overall performance, while Pro W6800 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Pro W6800 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Pro W6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Pro W6800 leads in combined 1440p performance. Pro W6800 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Pro W6800 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6550M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Pro W6800 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.