Radeon RX 7600M XTVSGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 Przetestowano w 0 grach▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Aktualne dane katalogu♢ Testing methodology
♜ ZWYCIĘZCARadeon RX 7600M XT+2%Lepsza wydajność ogólna
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M XT
VSZWYCIĘZCARadeon RX 7600M XT2%Ogólny indeks H2H
NVIDIA
RTX 2060 SUPER
Wydajność4941
Efektywność10078
Data confidence4560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
4941
10078
SPOŁECZNOŚĆ · ZWERYFIKOWANE DANE
Otwórz konfiguracje streamerów→Sprzęt używany przez streamerów
Prawdziwe publiczne konfiguracje powiązane z każdym urządzeniem.
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT0Brak jeszcze zweryfikowanej publicznej konfiguracji
NVIDIARTX 2060 SUPER0Brak jeszcze zweryfikowanej publicznej konfiguracji
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 2060 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7600M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 89–94of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
0 polubieńHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
100/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OCENA OGÓLNA
Przegląd
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
49Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
78
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
59
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE
Specyfikacja
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS20.23Better7.181
TDP120 WBetter175 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3Turing
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price—$399
Shader units / Cores20482176Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3x16
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date2023-01-042019
Recommended PSU—450 W
Length—229 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size204 mm²Better445 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 64 KB, L2 4 MB
Clock speed1280–2469 MHz1470 - 1650 MHzBetter
Base clock1280 MHz1470 MHzBetter
Boost clock2469 MHzBetter1650 MHz
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Bandwidth288 GB/s448 GB/sBetter
Power consumption120 WBetter175 W
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Transistor count13300 millionBetter10800 million
FPS w grach
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100554324%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007825%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3Turing
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Release date2023-01-042019
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 millionBetter10800 million
Die size204 mm²Better445 mm²
Shader units / Cores20482176Better
Base clock1280 MHz1470 MHzBetter
Boost clock2469 MHzBetter1650 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3x16
Length—229 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS20.23Better7.181
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
WYJAŚNIENIE AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Wyjaśnij to porównanie
Nie tylko procenty: przyczyny, istotne specyfikacje i praktyczny wpływ każdego wykresu.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
PRAWDZIWE KONFIGURACJE
Doświadczenia właścicieli
Prawdziwe zestawy, wyniki i opinie społeczności.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M XT or RTX 2060 SUPER?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2060 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2060 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.