Radeon RX 7700VSRadeon RX 9070 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7700+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 7700
VSWINNERRX 77000%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 9070 XT
Wydajność6470
Efektywność10077
Price / Performance8282
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6470
10077
8282
8888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 77000No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 9070 XT0No verified public setup yet
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA
The devices received the same overall score
RX 7700 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 7700 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 7700 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 8–13of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7700
0 polubieńHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7700
82/100 · Price $549The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OCENA OGÓLNA
Przegląd
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
64
70Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
59
63Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
50
54Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
77
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
74
74
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE
Specyfikacja
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1900 - 2600 MHzBetter1660 - 2970 MHz
Base clock1900 MHzBetter1660 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHz2970 MHzBetter
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GB16 GB
Taktowanie pamięci19,4 GHz20 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth621 GB/s640 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 5x16Better
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Power consumption200 WBetter304 W
TDP200 WBetter304 W
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date20252025
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS26.6248.66Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS w grach
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10064709%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10071778%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10071755%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007726%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10075784%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10074774%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10071755%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10077804%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10071755%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date20252025
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1900 MHzBetter1660 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHz2970 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 5x16Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth621 GB/s640 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7700 or RX 9070 XT?+
RX 7700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7700 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7700 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7700 offers more overall performance, while RX 7700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7700 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7700 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7700 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7700 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.