H2H

Radeon RX 9070 XTVSGeForce RTX 4090

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Radeon RX 9070 XT
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 9070 XT+6%Better overall performance
GeForce RTX 4090
AMDRX 9070 XT

2444,93 złAverage price

VS

4112,79 złAverage price

NVIDIARTX 4090
VS
WINNERRX 9070 XT6%H2H overall index
Wydajność7075
Efektywność7756
Price / Performance8266
Data confidence7575

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

RX 9070 XTRadeon RX 9070 XTAMD
RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090NVIDIA
H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
7075
Efficiency
7756
Price / performance
8266
Memory capacity
88100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Radeon RX 9070 XTAMDRX 9070 XT0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
GeForce RTX 4090NVIDIARTX 40900

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA

RX 9070 XT is the best overall choice

RX 9070 XT leads in combined gaming performance. RX 9070 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE6%

RX 9070 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE1668 zł

RX 9070 XT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 13–18of 723
RX 9070 XT#15position in the GPU ranking
RTX 4090#32position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 9070 XT

0 polubień

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 9070 XT

82/100 · Price $599

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OCENA OGÓLNA

Przegląd

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70
75Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
63
73Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54
58Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
77Better
56
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
74Better
70
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE

Specyfikacja

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
Clock speed1660 - 2970 MHz2235 - 2520 MHzBetter
Base clock1660 MHz2235 MHzBetter
Boost clock2970 MHzBetter2520 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
VRAM capacity16 GB24 GBBetter
Taktowanie pamięci20 GHz21 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s1008 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 5x16BetterPCIe 4x16
Power connector8+8 pin16 pinBetter
Power consumption304 WBetter450 W
TDP304 WBetter450 W
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date2025Better2022
Architecture
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPS48.6682.58Better
Launch price
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache

FPS w grach

Loading test-rig results…

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRX 9070 XTRTX 4090Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10070757%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10077804%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10075829%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008810013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100775632%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRX 9070 XTRTX 4090Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100788610%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100778510%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10075829%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100808911%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100758310%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

Basic information

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
Architecture
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date2025Better2022
Launch price

Detailed specifications

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Base clock1660 MHz2235 MHzBetter
Boost clock2970 MHzBetter2520 MHz

Form factor and compatibility

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
InterfacePCIe 5x16BetterPCIe 4x16
Length
Thickness
Recommended PSU
Power connector8+8 pin16 pinBetter

VRAM capacity and type

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth640 GB/s1008 GB/sBetter
Memory cache

Connectivity and outputs

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution

API and SDK compatibility

SpecificationsRX 9070 XTRTX 4090
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 9070 XT74
Device BRTX 409070
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 9070 XT or RTX 4090?

RX 9070 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 9070 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 4090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 4090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 9070 XT offers more overall performance, while RTX 4090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 4090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 9070 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 9070 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 9070 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 9070 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 9070 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 9070 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.