Radeon RX Vega 64VSGeForce GTX 950
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX Vega 64+2%Better overall performance
AMD
RX Vega 64
VSWINNERRX Vega 642%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GTX 950
Wydajność4428
Efektywność50100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4428
50100
100100
6856
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX Vega 640No verified public setup yet
NVIDIAGTX 9500No verified public setup yet
WYNIK PORÓWNANIA
RX Vega 64 is the best overall choice
RX Vega 64 leads in combined gaming performance. RX Vega 64 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX Vega 64 leads in the combined performance index
GTX 950 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 136–141of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX Vega 64
0 polubieńHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 950
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OCENA OGÓLNA
Przegląd
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
28
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
22
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
24
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
50
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
55
PEŁNE PORÓWNANIE
Specyfikacja
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1247 - 1546 MHzBetter1024 - 1188 MHz
Base clock1247 MHzBetter1024 MHz
Boost clock1546 MHzBetter1188 MHz
VRAM8 GB HBM2Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeHBM2GDDR5Better
VRAM capacity8 GBBetter2 GB
Taktowanie pamięci1,89 GHz6,6 GHzBetter
Memory bus2048 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth484 GB/sBetter106 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector8+8 pinBetter6 pin
Power consumption295 W90 WBetter
TDP295 W90 WBetter
Process node14 nmBetter28 nm
Release date2017Better2015
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS12.66Better1.825
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS w grach
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100442844%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100493436%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100513634%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005010067%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554032%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543932%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100513634%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100574328%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100513634%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node14 nmBetter28 nm
Release date2017Better2015
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1247 MHzBetter1024 MHz
Boost clock1546 MHzBetter1188 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pinBetter6 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB HBM2Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeHBM2GDDR5Better
Memory bus2048 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth484 GB/sBetter106 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Najczęstsze pytania o porównanie
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX Vega 64 or GTX 950?+
RX Vega 64 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX Vega 64 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 950 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 950 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX Vega 64 offers more overall performance, while RX Vega 64 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 950 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX Vega 64 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX Vega 64 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX Vega 64 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX Vega 64 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 950 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 950 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX Vega 64 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.