Intel Arc A750VSRadeon RX 6700 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A750+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A750
VSWINNERArc A7500%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 6700 XT
Desempenho5657
Eficiência8383
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5657
8383
100100
6880
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A7500No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 6700 XT0No verified public setup yet
RESULTADO DA COMPARAÇÃO
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A750 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 28–33of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A750
0 curtidasHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A750
100/100 · Price $289The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PONTUAÇÃO GERAL
Visão geral
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
56
57Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47
51Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44
45Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
83
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70
70
COMPARAÇÃO COMPLETA
Especificações
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed2050 - 2400 MHz2321 - 2581 MHzBetter
Base clock2050 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2581 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity8 GB12 GBBetter
Frequência da memória16 GHz16 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter384 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector6+8 pin6+8 pin
Power consumption225 WBetter230 W
TDP225 WBetter230 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2022Better2021
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS17.2Better13.21
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS em jogos
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10056572%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10061656%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10059637%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100688016%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10062678%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10061668%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10059637%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10063699%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10060646%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2022Better2021
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2050 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2581 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6+8 pin6+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter384 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Perguntas frequentes da comparação
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A750 or RX 6700 XT?+
Arc A750 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A750 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A750 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A750 offers more overall performance, while RX 6700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6700 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A750 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A750 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A750 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.