Radeon RX 7600 XTVSRadeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7600 XT+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 7600 XT
VSWINNERRX 7600 XT0%H2H overall index
AMD
Vega II 8CU 4700G
Desempenho5860
Price / Performance82100
Data confidence7530
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
5860
82100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 7600 XT0No verified public setup yet
AMDVega II 8CU 4700G0No verified public setup yet
RESULTADO DA COMPARAÇÃO
The devices received the same overall score
RX 7600 XT leads in combined gaming performance. Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Vega II 8CU 4700G costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 35–40of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600 XT
0 curtidasHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PONTUAÇÃO GERAL
Visão geral
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
58
60Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55Better
50
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
47Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
63
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70
70
COMPARAÇÃO COMPLETA
Especificações
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1720 - 2755 MHzBetter400 - 2100 MHz
Base clock1720 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2755 MHzBetter2100 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
VRAM capacity16 GB-
Frequência da memória18 GHz-
Memory bus128 bit-
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Power connector8 pin-
Power consumption190 W-
TDP190 W-
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2024Better2020
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS22.57Better2.1
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS em jogos
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10058603%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10068629%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100666010%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100726018%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100706015%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100666010%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100756022%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100676011%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2024Better2020
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1720 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock2755 MHzBetter2100 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pin-
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus128 bit-
Memory bandwidth288 GB/s—
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Perguntas frequentes da comparação
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7600 XT or Vega II 8CU 4700G?+
RX 7600 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7600 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7600 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7600 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7600 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7600 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7600 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7600 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7600 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7600 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7600 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7600 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.