Ryzen AI Max 385VSRyzen AI Max 390
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRyzen AI Max 385+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen AI Max 385
VSWINNERRyzen AI Max 3850%H2H overall index
AMD
Ryzen AI Max 390
Hiệu năng8383
Data confidence2525
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Single-core
8383
8383
CỘNG ĐỒNG · DỮ LIỆU XÁC MINH
Mở cấu hình streamer→Phần cứng streamer sử dụng
Cấu hình công khai thực tế liên kết với từng thiết bị.
AMDRyzen AI Max 3850Chưa có cấu hình công khai đã xác minh
AMDRyzen AI Max 3900Chưa có cấu hình công khai đã xác minh
KẾT QUẢ SO SÁNH
The devices received the same overall score
Ryzen AI Max 385 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
ĐIỂM TỔNG
Tổng quan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
83
83
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
66
66
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
64
64
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
76
76
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
83
83
SO SÁNH ĐẦY ĐỦ
Thông số
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark——
PBP / MTP——
Memory support——
ArchitectureZen 5Zen 5
Base clock3.6 GHzBetter3.2 GHz
Boost clock5 GHz5 GHz
Integrated graphicsRadeon 8040SRadeon 8050SBetter
Cores / Threads8 / 1612 / 24Better
Clock speed——
L3 cache——
Socket——
Power consumption——
Process node——
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10083830%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI GIẢI THÍCH · HEAD TO HEAD
Giải thích so sánh này
Không chỉ phần trăm: nguyên nhân, thông số liên quan và tác động thực tế phía sau từng biểu đồ.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CẤU HÌNH THỰC
Trải nghiệm chủ sở hữu
Cấu hình thực, kết quả và phản hồi cộng đồng.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Câu hỏi thường gặp về so sánh
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen AI Max 385 or Ryzen AI Max 390?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen AI Max 385 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen AI Max 385 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen AI Max 385 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen AI Max 385 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.