Radeon 760M 8600GVSRadeon RX 6850M XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6850M XT+4%Better gaming performance
AMD
760M 8600G
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6850M XT4%Better gaming performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6850M XT
Hiệu năng4850
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
4850
CỘNG ĐỒNG · DỮ LIỆU XÁC MINH
Mở cấu hình streamer→Phần cứng streamer sử dụng
Cấu hình công khai thực tế liên kết với từng thiết bị.
AMD760M 8600G0Chưa có cấu hình công khai đã xác minh
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT0Chưa có cấu hình công khai đã xác minh
KẾT QUẢ SO SÁNH
The devices received the same overall score
760M 8600G leads in combined gaming performance. 760M 8600G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6850M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 760M 8600G
0 lượt thíchHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 760M 8600G
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
ĐIỂM TỔNG
Tổng quan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48
50Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41
42Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
40Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
54
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
SO SÁNH ĐẦY ĐỦ
Thông số
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP—165 W
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
TFLOPS5.3213.21Better
Clock speed800 - 2800 MHz2321–2581 MHzBetter
Video memory- SMA12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory clock—2250 MHz
Memory bus—192 bit
Bandwidth—432 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Power connector—None
Power consumption—165 W
Base clock800 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter2581 MHz
Process node4 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232022-01-04
Architecture—RDNA 2
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness—IGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Launch price——
Transistor count—17200 million
Die size—335 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2560
Memory cache—L1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
FPS trong game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10048504%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100080200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100486327%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100486225%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100486632%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100485921%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
Architecture—RDNA 2
Process node4 nmBetter7 nm
Release date20232022-01-04
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count—17200 million
Die size—335 mm²
Shader units / Cores—2560
Base clock800 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter2581 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
Thickness—IGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connector—None
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory- SMA12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus—192 bit
TFLOPS5.3213.21Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI GIẢI THÍCH · HEAD TO HEAD
Giải thích so sánh này
Không chỉ phần trăm: nguyên nhân, thông số liên quan và tác động thực tế phía sau từng biểu đồ.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CẤU HÌNH THỰC
Trải nghiệm chủ sở hữu
Cấu hình thực, kết quả và phản hồi cộng đồng.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Câu hỏi thường gặp về so sánh
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 760M 8600G or Radeon RX 6850M XT?+
760M 8600G has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
760M 8600G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
760M 8600G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
760M 8600G offers more overall performance, while 760M 8600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
760M 8600G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
760M 8600G leads in combined 1440p performance. 760M 8600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
760M 8600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 760M 8600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.