AMD
AMD A6-9400 vs AMD A6-9500
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
A6-9500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared A6-9400 and A6-9500 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗A6-9500 outperforms A6-9400 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+3%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD A6-9400 vs AMD A6-9500: key takeaway
The comparison of A6-9400 and A6-9500 shows a 0% advantage for A6-9400 in gaming performance, while A6-9500 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
11
6263
66
00
22
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
A6-9400 leads in overall performance, while A6-9400 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
A6-9500 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares A6-9400 and A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
1
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
7
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
2
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
1
1
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares A6-9400 and A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark18381893Better
Cores / Threads22
PBP / MTP65 W65 W
Clock speed3,4 -3,7 GHz3,5 - 3,8 GHzBetter
Base clock3400 MHz3500 MHzBetter
Boost clock3700 MHz3800 MHzBetter
L1 cache80 KB per module80 KB per module
L2 cache1 MB per module1 MB per module
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
SocketAM4AM4
Integrated graphicsR5 1 GHzR5 1 GHz
Power consumption65 W65 W
Process node28 nm28 nm
ArchitectureBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Memory supportDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Release date20162016
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares A6-9400 and A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10062632%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100660%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10022220%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100550%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares A6-9400 and A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: A6-9400 or A6-9500?+
A6-9400 has the higher overall gaming score, while A6-9400 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
A6-9400 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
A6-9400 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
A6-9400 offers more overall performance, while A6-9400 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
A6-9400 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
A6-9400 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
A6-9400 leads in combined 1440p performance. A6-9400 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
A6-9400 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
A6-9400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
A6-9400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to A6-9400 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.