Apple
Apple M1 vs Apple M3
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Apple
M3
Aggregate performance score
We've compared M1 and M3 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗M3 outperforms M1 by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+35%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Apple M1 vs Apple M3: key takeaway
The comparison of M1 and M3 shows a 33% advantage for M3 in gaming performance, while M1 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
ApplePerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
Efficiency
912
5368
2127
7560
COMPARISON RESULT
M1 is the best overall choice
M1 leads in overall performance, while M1 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
M1 leads in the combined performance index
M1 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares M1 and M3 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
9
12Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
13
15Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
10
13Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
75Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
24Better
23
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares M1 and M3 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
PassMark1412319081Better
Device classMobileMobile
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Clock speedUp to 3.2 GHzUp to 4.1 GHzBetter
Base clock——
Boost clock3.2 GHz4.1 GHzBetter
L1 cacheApple core-type L1 cache (varies by P/E core)Apple core-type L1 cache (varies by P/E core)
L2 cacheApple shared L2 cache by core clusterApple shared L2 cache by core cluster
L3 cache——
Memory supportUnified memory, LPDDR4X, up to 16 GBUnified memory, up to 24 GB, 100 GB/sBetter
Integrated graphicsApple 7-core / 8-core GPUApple 10-core GPUBetter
PBP / MTP10 / 15 W15 / 25 WBetter
Power consumption15 WBetter25 W
Release date20202023
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares M1 and M3 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100536825%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100212725%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100334224%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100212725%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares M1 and M3 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10091229%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: M1 or M3?+
M1 has the higher overall gaming score, while M1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
M1 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
M1 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
M1 offers more overall performance, while M1 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
M1 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
M1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
M1 leads in combined 1440p performance. M1 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
M1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
M1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
M1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to M1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.