AMD
AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Celeron G6900TE
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Celeron G6900TE
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G6900TE by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+36%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Celeron G6900TE: key takeaway
The comparison of Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE shows a 50% advantage for Athlon 3000G in gaming performance, while Celeron G6900TE may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
32
5840
74
00
117
COMPARISON RESULT
Athlon 3000G is the best overall choice
Athlon 3000G leads in overall performance, while Athlon 3000G offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Athlon 3000G leads in the combined performance index
Athlon 3000G costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
3Better
2
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
9Better
8
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
6Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
11Better
7
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
5Better
3
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark4587Better3373
PBP / MTP35 W35 W
Cores / Threads2 / 42P / 2
Clock speed3,5 GHzBetterP 2,4 GHz
Base clock3500 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Boost clock3500 MHzBetter2400 MHz
L1 cache192 KBBetter80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB per P-core, 2 MB per E-core clusterBetter
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
SocketAM4LGA1700Better
ArchitecturePicassoAlder Lake
Integrated graphicsVega 3 1,1 GHzUHD 710 1,3 GHzBetter
Power consumption35 W35 W
Process node14 nm10 nm (Intel 7)Better
Memory supportDDR4-2666DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200Better
Release date20192017
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100584037%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 1007455%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100211440%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1006367%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Athlon 3000G and Celeron G6900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100220%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Athlon 3000G or Celeron G6900TE?+
Athlon 3000G has the higher overall gaming score, while Athlon 3000G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Athlon 3000G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Athlon 3000G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Athlon 3000G offers more overall performance, while Athlon 3000G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Athlon 3000G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Athlon 3000G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Athlon 3000G leads in combined 1440p performance. Athlon 3000G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Athlon 3000G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Athlon 3000G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Athlon 3000G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Athlon 3000G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.