H2H

AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Core i3-9100E

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i3-9100E outperforms Athlon 3000G by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+35%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

AMD Athlon 3000G vs Intel Core i3-9100E: key takeaway

The comparison of Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E shows a 33% advantage for Core i3-9100E in gaming performance, while Athlon 3000G may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
34
Single-core
5862
Multi-core
712
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
118
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

Athlon 3000G leads in overall performance, while Athlon 3000G offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$353

Athlon 3000G costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryAthlon 3000GCore i3-9100E
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
3
4Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
9
9
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
6
7Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
11Better
8
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
5
5
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationAthlon 3000GCore i3-9100E
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark45876189Better
PBP / MTP35 W65 WBetter
Cores / Threads2 / 44Better
Clock speed3,5 GHzBetter3,1 - 3,7 GHz
Base clock3500 MHzBetter3100 MHz
Boost clock3500 MHz3700 MHzBetter
L1 cache192 KBBetter64 KB per core
L2 cache1 MB256 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache4 MB6 MBBetter
SocketAM4LGA1151v2Better
ArchitecturePicassoCoffee Lake Refresh
Integrated graphicsVega 3 1,1 GHzUHD 630 1,05 GHzBetter
Power consumption35 WBetter65 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2666DDR4-2400 / DDR3-1600
Release date20192018
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexAthlon 3000GCore i3-9100EDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10058627%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10071253%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100212517%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10061050%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Athlon 3000G and Core i3-9100E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexAthlon 3000GCore i3-9100EDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1002340%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1002340%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1002340%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002340%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AAthlon 3000G5
Device BCore i3-9100E5
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Athlon 3000G or Core i3-9100E?

Athlon 3000G has the higher overall gaming score, while Athlon 3000G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Athlon 3000G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Athlon 3000G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Athlon 3000G offers more overall performance, while Athlon 3000G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Athlon 3000G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Athlon 3000G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Athlon 3000G leads in combined 1440p performance. Athlon 3000G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Athlon 3000G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Athlon 3000G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Athlon 3000G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Athlon 3000G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.