H2H

AMD Athlon X4 970 vs AMD PRO A6-9500

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Athlon X4 970 outperforms PRO A6-9500 by 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+104%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

AMD Athlon X4 970 vs AMD PRO A6-9500: key takeaway

The comparison of Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 shows a 100% advantage for Athlon X4 970 in gaming performance, while PRO A6-9500 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
21
Single-core
6763
Multi-core
136
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
42
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Athlon X4 970 is the best overall choice

Athlon X4 970 leads in overall performance, while Athlon X4 970 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE100%

Athlon X4 970 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$23

PRO A6-9500 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryAthlon X4 970PRO A6-9500
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
2Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
8Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
4Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
2Better
1
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationAthlon X4 970PRO A6-9500
Integrated graphicsR5 1 GHz
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark3811Better1872
PBP / MTP65 W65 W
Cores / Threads4Better2
SocketAM4AM4
ArchitectureBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Release date2016
Clock speed3,8 - 4 GHzBetter3,5 - 3,8 GHz
Base clock3800 MHzBetter3500 MHz
Boost clock4000 MHzBetter3800 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per module80 KB per module
L2 cache1 MB per module1 MB per module
L3 cache2 MBBetter1 MB
Power consumption65 W65 W
Process node28 nm28 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexAthlon X4 970PRO A6-9500Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10067636%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10013674%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100272220%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10011575%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Athlon X4 970 and PRO A6-9500 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexAthlon X4 970PRO A6-9500Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002167%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AAthlon X4 9702
Device BPRO A6-95001
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Athlon X4 970 or PRO A6-9500?

Athlon X4 970 has the higher overall gaming score, while Athlon X4 970 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Athlon X4 970 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Athlon X4 970 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Athlon X4 970 offers more overall performance, while Athlon X4 970 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Athlon X4 970 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Athlon X4 970 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Athlon X4 970 leads in combined 1440p performance. Athlon X4 970 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Athlon X4 970 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Athlon X4 970 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Athlon X4 970 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Athlon X4 970 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.