Intel
Intel CC150 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Ryzen 5 1600X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗CC150 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel CC150 vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X: key takeaway
The comparison of CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X shows a 13% advantage for CC150 in gaming performance, while Ryzen 5 1600X may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
98
5867
2824
00
1211
COMPARISON RESULT
CC150 is the best overall choice
CC150 leads in overall performance, while CC150 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
CC150 leads in the combined performance index
Ryzen 5 1600X costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
9Better
8
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
13Better
12
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
10
10
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
12Better
11
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
10Better
9
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Power consumption95 W95 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2666 / DDR3-1866DDR4-2666
Integrated graphics—No
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark14416Better13065
PBP / MTP95 W95 W
SocketLGA1151v2BetterAM4
Cores / Threads8 / 16Better6 / 12
Release date—2017
ArchitectureCoffee Lake RefreshSummit Ridge
Boost clock3500 MHz4000 MHzBetter
Clock speed3,5 GHz3,6 - 4 GHzBetter
Base clock3500 MHz3600 MHzBetter
L1 cache64 KB per core576 KBBetter
L2 cache256 KB per coreBetter3 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100586714%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100282415%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10033330%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100232014%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares CC150 and Ryzen 5 1600X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100660%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1007615%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100550%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1007615%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1007615%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: CC150 or Ryzen 5 1600X?+
CC150 has the higher overall gaming score, while CC150 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
CC150 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
CC150 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
CC150 offers more overall performance, while CC150 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
CC150 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
CC150 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
CC150 leads in combined 1440p performance. CC150 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
CC150 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
CC150 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
CC150 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to CC150 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.