Intel
Intel Celeron G5930 vs AMD PRO A6-9500E
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
PRO A6-9500E
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Celeron G5930 outperforms PRO A6-9500E by 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+74%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Celeron G5930 vs AMD PRO A6-9500E: key takeaway
The comparison of Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E shows a 100% advantage for Celeron G5930 in gaming performance, while PRO A6-9500E may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
21
6257
66
00
44
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Celeron G5930 leads in overall performance, while Celeron G5930 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Celeron G5930 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
2Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
8Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
4
4
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
2
2
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date20172016
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark2896Better1662
PBP / MTP58 WBetter35 W
Cores / Threads22
SocketLGA1200BetterAM4
ArchitectureComet LakeBristol Ridge
Clock speed3,7 GHzBetter3 - 3,4 GHz
Base clock3700 MHzBetter3000 MHz
Boost clock3700 MHzBetter3400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core80 KB per moduleBetter
L2 cache256 KB per coreBetter1 MB per module
L3 cache2 MBBetter1 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 610 1,05 GHzBetterR5 0,8 GHz
Power consumption58 W35 WBetter
Process node14 nmBetter28 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2666DDR4-2400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10062578%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100660%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100222010%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100550%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Celeron G5930 and PRO A6-9500E with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Celeron G5930 or PRO A6-9500E?+
Celeron G5930 has the higher overall gaming score, while Celeron G5930 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Celeron G5930 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Celeron G5930 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Celeron G5930 offers more overall performance, while Celeron G5930 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Celeron G5930 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Celeron G5930 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Celeron G5930 leads in combined 1440p performance. Celeron G5930 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Celeron G5930 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Celeron G5930 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Celeron G5930 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Celeron G5930 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.