H2H

Intel Core 5 120F vs Intel Core i5-14401EF

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i5-14401EF outperforms Core 5 120F by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+1%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core 5 120F vs Intel Core i5-14401EF: key takeaway

The comparison of Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF shows a 0% advantage for Core 5 120F in gaming performance, while Core i5-14401EF may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
1414
Single-core
7578
Multi-core
2324
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
1611
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core 5 120F is the best overall choice

Core 5 120F leads in overall performance, while Core 5 120F offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

Core 5 120F leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$7

Core i5-14401EF costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore 5 120FCore i5-14401EF
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
14
14
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
16
16
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
14
14
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
11
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
14Better
13
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore 5 120FCore i5-14401EF
Device classDesktopDesktop
Integrated graphics
PassMark2147721483Better
PBP / MTP65 / 110 W65 / 154 W
Cores / Threads6P / 126P / 12
Clock speedP 2,5 - 4,5 GHzP 2,5 - 4,7 GHz
Base clock2500 MHz2500 MHz
Boost clock4500 MHz4700 MHzBetter
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache18 MB20 MBBetter
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshRaptor Lake Refresh
Release date2023
Power consumption65 / 110 W65 / 154 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 120FCore i5-14401EFDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10075784%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10023244%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10035363%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10018195%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 120F and Core i5-14401EF with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 120FCore i5-14401EFDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100880%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011110%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore 5 120F14
Device BCore i5-14401EF13
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 120F or Core i5-14401EF?

Core 5 120F has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 120F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core 5 120F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core 5 120F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core 5 120F offers more overall performance, while Core 5 120F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core 5 120F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core 5 120F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core 5 120F leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 120F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core 5 120F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 5 120F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 5 120F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core 5 120F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.