Intel
Intel Core 5 120F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Ryzen Threadripper 1940X outperforms Core 5 120F by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 5 120F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940X: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X shows a 7% advantage for Ryzen Threadripper 1940X in gaming performance, while Core 5 120F may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
1415
7567
2357
01
1610
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Core 5 120F leads in overall performance, while Core 5 120F offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
14
15Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
16
17Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
14
15Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
10
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
14
14
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
Integrated graphics—No
PassMark2147723606Better
PBP / MTP65 / 110 W180 WBetter
Cores / Threads6P / 1214 / 28Better
Clock speedP 2,5 - 4,5 GHz3,5 - 4 GHzBetter
Base clock2500 MHz3500 MHzBetter
Boost clock4500 MHzBetter4000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core96 KB per coreBetter
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster512 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache18 MB32 MBBetter
SocketLGA1700BetterTR4
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshWhitehaven
Release date—2017
Power consumption65 / 110 WBetter180 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2666 4 channels
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100756711%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100235785%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100355137%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100184688%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 120F and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100101110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10011129%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1008912%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10011129%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 120F or Ryzen Threadripper 1940X?+
Core 5 120F has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 120F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 5 120F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 5 120F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 5 120F offers more overall performance, while Core 5 120F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 5 120F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 5 120F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 5 120F leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 120F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 5 120F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 5 120F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 5 120F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 5 120F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.