H2H

Intel Core 5 120UL vs Intel Core 5 221TE

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core 5 221TE outperforms Core 5 120UL by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+26%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core 5 120UL vs Intel Core 5 221TE: key takeaway

The comparison of Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE shows a 29% advantage for Core 5 221TE in gaming performance, while Core 5 120UL may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
79
Single-core
7783
Multi-core
2534
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
1611
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

Core 5 120UL leads in overall performance, while Core 5 120UL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$45

Core 5 221TE costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore 5 120ULCore 5 221TE
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
7
9Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
11
13Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
9
10Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
11
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
9
9
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore 5 120ULCore 5 221TE
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark1055813301Better
PBP / MTP15 / 55 W45 / 106 WBetter
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor Lake PSBartlett Lake
Release date
Cores / Threads2P+8E / 126P+4E / 16Better
Integrated graphicsIris Xe 80 1,25 GHzUHD 730 1,55 GHzBetter
Power consumption15 / 55 WBetter45 / 106 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Clock speedP 1,3 - 4,6 GHz / E 0,9 - 3,4 GHzP 1,8 - 5 GHz / E 1,3 - 3,6 GHzBetter
Base clock1300 MHz1800 MHzBetter
Boost clock4600 MHz5000 MHzBetter
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache12 MB24 MBBetter
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 120ULCore 5 221TEDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10077838%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100253431%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100374417%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100202730%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 120UL and Core 5 221TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 120ULCore 5 221TEDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1005618%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1006715%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1004522%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1006715%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005733%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore 5 120UL9
Device BCore 5 221TE9
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 120UL or Core 5 221TE?

Core 5 120UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 120UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core 5 120UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core 5 120UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core 5 120UL offers more overall performance, while Core 5 120UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core 5 120UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core 5 120UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core 5 120UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 120UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core 5 120UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 5 120UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 5 120UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core 5 120UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.