Intel
Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel CC150
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
CC150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 5 130HL and CC150 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 5 130HL outperforms CC150 by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+34%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel CC150: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 5 130HL and CC150 shows a 33% advantage for Core 5 130HL in gaming performance, while CC150 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
129
8058
3428
00
1612
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 5 130HL is the best overall choice
Core 5 130HL leads in overall performance, while Core 5 130HL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 5 130HL leads in the combined performance index
CC150 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 5 130HL and CC150 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
12Better
9
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
15Better
13
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
13Better
10
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
12
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
13Better
10
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 5 130HL and CC150 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark19264Better14416
PBP / MTP45 / 95 W95 WBetter
Cores / Threads4P+8E / 168 / 16Better
SocketLGA1700BetterLGA1151v2
ArchitectureRaptor Lake PSCoffee Lake Refresh
Release date——
Clock speedP 2,6 - 4,8 GHz / E 1.6 - 3,6 GHz3,5 GHzBetter
Base clock2600 MHz3500 MHzBetter
Boost clock4800 MHzBetter3500 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-coreBetter64 KB per core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster256 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache18 MBBetter16 MB
Integrated graphicsIris Xe 80 1,5 GHz—
Power consumption45 / 95 WBetter95 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2666 / DDR3-1866
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 130HL and CC150 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100805832%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100342819%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100433326%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100272316%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 130HL and CC150 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1009640%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1009725%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1007533%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10010735%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1009725%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 130HL or CC150?+
Core 5 130HL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 130HL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 5 130HL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 5 130HL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 5 130HL offers more overall performance, while Core 5 130HL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 5 130HL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 5 130HL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 5 130HL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 130HL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 5 130HL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 5 130HL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 5 130HL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 5 130HL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.