H2H

Intel Core 5 130UL vs Intel Core i3-12100TE

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i3-12100TE outperforms Core 5 130UL by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+21%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core 5 130UL vs Intel Core i3-12100TE: key takeaway

The comparison of Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE shows a 14% advantage for Core i3-12100TE in gaming performance, while Core 5 130UL may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
78
Single-core
7867
Multi-core
2513
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
1614
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

Core 5 130UL leads in overall performance, while Core 5 130UL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$75

Core i3-12100TE costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore 5 130ULCore i3-12100TE
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
7
8Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
11
12Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
9
10Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
14
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
9
9
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore 5 130ULCore i3-12100TE
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark1069712961Better
PBP / MTP15 / 55 W35 / 69 WBetter
Cores / Threads2P+8E / 124P / 8Better
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Clock speedP 1,6 - 4,7 GHz / E 1,2 - 3,5 GHzP 2,1 - 4 GHzBetter
Base clock1600 MHz2100 MHzBetter
Boost clock4700 MHzBetter4000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterBetter1.25 MB per P-core, 2 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache12 MB12 MB
ArchitectureRaptor Lake PSAlder Lake
Release date2021
Integrated graphicsIris Xe 80 1,25 GHzUHD 730 1,4 GHzBetter
Power consumption15 / 55 WBetter35 / 69 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 130ULCore i3-12100TEDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100786715%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100251363%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100372731%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100201158%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 130UL and Core i3-12100TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 130ULCore i3-12100TEDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1005618%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100660%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1004522%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100660%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005618%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore 5 130UL9
Device BCore i3-12100TE9
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 130UL or Core i3-12100TE?

Core 5 130UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 130UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core 5 130UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core 5 130UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core 5 130UL offers more overall performance, while Core 5 130UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core 5 130UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core 5 130UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core 5 130UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 130UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core 5 130UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 5 130UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 5 130UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core 5 130UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.