Intel
Intel Core 5 211EF vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 5 211EF outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1940 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+5%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 5 211EF vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1940: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 shows a 0% advantage for Core 5 211EF in gaming performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
1515
8262
3353
01
1310
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 5 211EF is the best overall choice
Core 5 211EF leads in overall performance, while Core 5 211EF offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 5 211EF leads in the combined performance index
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
15
15
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
17
17
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
15
15
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
13Better
10
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
15Better
14
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
PBP / MTP65 / 148 W180 WBetter
Base clock2700 MHz3200 MHzBetter
Boost clock4900 MHzBetter3700 MHz
Cores / Threads6P+4E / 1614 / 28Better
ArchitectureBartlett LakeWhitehaven
Release date—2017
Integrated graphics—No
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark23820Better22742
SocketLGA1700BetterTR4
Clock speedP 2,7 - 4,9 GHz / E 2 - 3,7 GHz3,2 - 3,7 GHzBetter
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core96 KB per coreBetter
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster512 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache20 MB32 MBBetter
Power consumption65 / 148 WBetter180 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
Memory supportDDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2666 4 channels
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100826228%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100335347%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100434811%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100274243%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 211EF and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10012120%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100990%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10012120%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011110%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 211EF or Ryzen Threadripper 1940?+
Core 5 211EF has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 211EF offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 5 211EF is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 5 211EF is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 5 211EF offers more overall performance, while Core 5 211EF offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 5 211EF is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 5 211EF is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 5 211EF leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 211EF can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 5 211EF is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 5 211EF is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 5 211EF is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 5 211EF if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.