H2H

Intel Core 5 221E vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core 5 221E by 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+10%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core 5 221E vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: key takeaway

The comparison of Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX shows a 10% advantage for Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX in gaming performance, while Core 5 221E may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
2022
Single-core
8772
Multi-core
4552
L3 cache
01
Efficiency
1610
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

The devices received the same overall score

Core 5 221E leads in overall performance, while Core 5 221E offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE$97

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore 5 221ERyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
20
22Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
21
22Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
18
20Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
10
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
19
19
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore 5 221ERyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Device classDesktopServer
PassMark3051033514Better
PBP / MTP65 / 154 W280 WBetter
Cores / Threads6P+8E / 2012 / 24Better
SocketLGA1700BettersWRX8
ArchitectureBartlett LakeCastle Peak
Release date2019
Clock speedP 2,7 - 5,2 GHz / E 2,1 - 3,9 GHz4 - 4,3 GHzBetter
Base clock2700 MHz4000 MHzBetter
Boost clock5200 MHzBetter4300 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core768 KBBetter
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster6 MBBetter
L3 cache24 MB64 MBBetter
Integrated graphicsUHD 730 1,55 GHzNo
Power consumption65 / 154 WBetter280 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)7 nmBetter
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-3200 8 channels
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 221ERyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100877219%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100455214%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10051510%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100364215%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 221E and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore 5 221ERyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100141613%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10016176%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10012138%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100161812%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100151713%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore 5 221E19
Device BRyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX19
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 221E or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?

Core 5 221E has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 221E offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core 5 221E is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core 5 221E is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core 5 221E offers more overall performance, while Core 5 221E offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core 5 221E is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core 5 221E is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core 5 221E leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 221E can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core 5 221E is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core 5 221E is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core 5 221E is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core 5 221E if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.