Intel
Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i5-11600K
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Core i5-11600K
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 5 223PQE outperforms Core i5-11600K by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+51%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 5 223PQE vs Intel Core i5-11600K: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K shows a 46% advantage for Core 5 223PQE in gaming performance, while Core i5-11600K may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
1913
9282
3730
00
917
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 5 223PQE is the best overall choice
Core 5 223PQE leads in overall performance, while Core 5 223PQE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 5 223PQE leads in the combined performance index
Core i5-11600K costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
19Better
13
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
20Better
16
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
18Better
13
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
9
17Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
17Better
14
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Cores / Threads8P / 16Better6 / 12
Clock speedP 4 - 5,5 GHzBetter3,9 - 4,9 GHz
SocketLGA1700BetterLGA1200
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark29716Better19655
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WBetter95 W
ArchitectureBartlett LakeRocket Lake
Release date—2021
Base clock4000 MHzBetter3900 MHz
Boost clock5500 MHzBetter4900 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster512 KB per coreBetter
L3 cache24 MBBetter12 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 770 1,65 GHzBetterUHD 750 1,3 GHz
Power consumption125 / 253 W95 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better14 nm
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100928211%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100373021%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100484116%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100292419%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 5 223PQE and Core i5-11600K with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10013936%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100151040%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011832%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100151040%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100141033%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 5 223PQE or Core i5-11600K?+
Core 5 223PQE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 5 223PQE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 5 223PQE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 5 223PQE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 5 223PQE offers more overall performance, while Core 5 223PQE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 5 223PQE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 5 223PQE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 5 223PQE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 5 223PQE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 5 223PQE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 5 223PQE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 5 223PQE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 5 223PQE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.