Intel
Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Processor U302L
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Processor U302L
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 7 150UL outperforms Processor U302L by 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+155%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 7 150UL vs Intel Processor U302L: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L shows a 133% advantage for Core 7 150UL in gaming performance, while Processor U302L may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
73
8340
276
00
167
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 7 150UL is the best overall choice
Core 7 150UL leads in overall performance, while Core 7 150UL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 7 150UL leads in the combined performance index
Processor U302L costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
7Better
3
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
11Better
9
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
9Better
6
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
16Better
7
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
9Better
4
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark10864Better4268
Cores / Threads2P+8E / 12Better1P+4E / 6
PBP / MTP15 / 55 W15 / 55 W
Clock speedP 1,7 - 5 GHz / E 1,2 - 3,7 GHzBetterP 1,2 - 2,4 GHz / E 0,9 - 1,8 GHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter1200 MHz
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor Lake PSRaptor Lake Refresh
Release date——
Boost clock5000 MHzBetter2400 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache12 MBBetter10 MB
Integrated graphicsIris Xe 96 1,3 GHzBetterUHD 80 1,1 GHz
Power consumption15 / 55 W15 / 55 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100834070%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100276127%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100401686%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100215123%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 7 150UL and Processor U302L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1005286%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10062100%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1004267%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10062100%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005286%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 7 150UL or Processor U302L?+
Core 7 150UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 7 150UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 7 150UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 7 150UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 7 150UL offers more overall performance, while Core 7 150UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 7 150UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 7 150UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 7 150UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 7 150UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 7 150UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 7 150UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 7 150UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 7 150UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.