Intel
Intel Core 7 160HL vs AMD A6-9550
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
A6-9550
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 7 160HL outperforms A6-9550 by 967% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+967%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 7 160HL vs AMD A6-9550: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 shows a 1500% advantage for Core 7 160HL in gaming performance, while A6-9550 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
161
8767
457
00
172
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 7 160HL is the best overall choice
Core 7 160HL leads in overall performance, while Core 7 160HL offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 7 160HL leads in the combined performance index
A6-9550 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
16Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
18Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
16Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
17Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
16Better
1
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Base clock2500 MHz3800 MHzBetter
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark24198Better2268
PBP / MTP45 / 115 W65 WBetter
Cores / Threads6P+8E / 20Better2
Clock speedP 2,5 - 5,2 GHz / E 1,8 - 4 GHz3,8 - 4 GHzBetter
Boost clock5200 MHzBetter4000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per module
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterBetter1 MB per module
L3 cache24 MBBetter1 MB
SocketLGA1700BetterAM4
ArchitectureRaptor Lake PSBristol Ridge
Release date—2016
Integrated graphicsIris Xe 96 1,5 GHzBetterR5 1 GHz
Power consumption45 / 115 WBetter65 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better28 nm
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100876726%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100457146%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100512472%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100365151%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 7 160HL and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100111167%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100131171%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10091160%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100131171%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100121169%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 7 160HL or A6-9550?+
Core 7 160HL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 7 160HL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 7 160HL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 7 160HL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 7 160HL offers more overall performance, while Core 7 160HL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 7 160HL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 7 160HL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 7 160HL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 7 160HL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 7 160HL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 7 160HL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 7 160HL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 7 160HL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.