Intel
Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i9-13900TE
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Core i9-13900TE
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core 7 251TE outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+90%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core 7 251TE vs Intel Core i9-13900TE: key takeaway
The comparison of Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE shows a 90% advantage for Core 7 251TE in gaming performance, while Core i9-13900TE may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
1910
9083
7670
11
1812
COMPARISON RESULT
Core 7 251TE is the best overall choice
Core 7 251TE leads in overall performance, while Core 7 251TE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core 7 251TE leads in the combined performance index
Core i9-13900TE costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
19Better
10
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
20Better
14
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
18Better
11
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
18Better
12
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
19Better
10
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark30022Better15819
PBP / MTP45 / 135 WBetter35 / 106 W
ArchitectureBartlett LakeRaptor Lake
Release date—2022
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 328P+16E / 32
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Clock speedP 1,4 - 5,4 GHz / E 1 - 3,9 GHzBetterP 1 - 5 GHz / E 1 - 3,9 GHz
Base clock1400 MHzBetter1000 MHz
Boost clock5400 MHzBetter5000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache36 MB36 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 770 1,6 GHzUHD 770 1,65 GHz
Power consumption45 / 135 W35 / 106 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10090838%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10076708%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10069648%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10061569%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core 7 251TE and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10014767%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10015861%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10011659%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10015861%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10014855%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 7 251TE or Core i9-13900TE?+
Core 7 251TE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 7 251TE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 7 251TE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 7 251TE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 7 251TE offers more overall performance, while Core 7 251TE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 7 251TE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 7 251TE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 7 251TE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 7 251TE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 7 251TE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 7 251TE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 7 251TE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 7 251TE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.