H2H

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Xeon W-2104

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon W-2104 by 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+7%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i3-8100 vs Intel Xeon W-2104: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 shows a 0% advantage for Core i3-8100 in gaming performance, while Xeon W-2104 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
44
Single-core
6053
Multi-core
1211
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
84
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core i3-8100 is the best overall choice

Core i3-8100 leads in overall performance, while Core i3-8100 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE25%

Core i3-8100 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$133

Core i3-8100 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i3-8100Xeon W-2104
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
4
4
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
9
9
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
7
7
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
8Better
4
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
5Better
4
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i3-8100Xeon W-2104
Release date2017
Device classDesktopServer
PassMark6135Better5729
PBP / MTP65 W120 WBetter
Cores / Threads44
SocketLGA1151v2LGA2066Better
ArchitectureCoffee LakeSkylake-X
Clock speed3,6 GHzBetter3,2 GHz
Base clock3600 MHzBetter3200 MHz
Boost clock3600 MHzBetter3200 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core64 KB per core
L2 cache256 KB per coreBetter1 MB per core
L3 cache6 MB8.25 MBBetter
Integrated graphicsUHD 630 1,1 GHzNo
Power consumption65 WBetter120 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2400 / DDR3-1600DDR4-2400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i3-8100Xeon W-2104Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100605312%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10012119%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100252213%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010911%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i3-8100 and Xeon W-2104 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i3-8100Xeon W-2104Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100330%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100330%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100330%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100330%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i3-81005
Device BXeon W-21044
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i3-8100 or Xeon W-2104?

Core i3-8100 has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i3-8100 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i3-8100 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i3-8100 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i3-8100 offers more overall performance, while Core i3-8100 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i3-8100 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i3-8100 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i3-8100 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i3-8100 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i3-8100 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i3-8100 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i3-8100 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i3-8100 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.