Intel
Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Celeron G5900
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Celeron G5900
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron G5900 by 644% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+644%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core i5-11600K vs Intel Celeron G5900: key takeaway
The comparison of Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 shows a 550% advantage for Core i5-11600K in gaming performance, while Celeron G5900 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
132
8257
306
00
174
COMPARISON RESULT
Core i5-11600K is the best overall choice
Core i5-11600K leads in overall performance, while Core i5-11600K offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core i5-11600K leads in the combined performance index
Celeron G5900 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
13Better
2
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
16Better
8
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
13Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
17Better
4
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
14Better
2
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date20212017
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark19655Better2643
PBP / MTP95 WBetter58 W
Cores / Threads6 / 12Better2
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
ArchitectureRocket LakeComet Lake
Clock speed3,9 - 4,9 GHzBetter3,4 GHz
Base clock3900 MHzBetter3400 MHz
Boost clock4900 MHzBetter3400 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per coreBetter64 KB per core
L2 cache512 KB per coreBetter256 KB per core
L3 cache12 MBBetter2 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 750 1,3 GHzBetterUHD 610 1,05 GHz
Power consumption95 W58 WBetter
Process node14 nm14 nm
Memory supportDDR4-3200DDR4-2666
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100825736%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100306133%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100412069%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100245131%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core i5-11600K and Celeron G5900 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10091160%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100102133%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10081156%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100102133%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100102133%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i5-11600K or Celeron G5900?+
Core i5-11600K has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i5-11600K offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i5-11600K is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i5-11600K is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i5-11600K offers more overall performance, while Core i5-11600K offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i5-11600K is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i5-11600K is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i5-11600K leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i5-11600K can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i5-11600K is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i5-11600K is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i5-11600K is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i5-11600K if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.