Intel
Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Processor U301L
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Processor U301L
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Core i5-9600K outperforms Processor U301L by 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+181%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Core i5-9600K vs Intel Processor U301L: key takeaway
The comparison of Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L shows a 250% advantage for Core i5-9600K in gaming performance, while Processor U301L may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
72
7737
236
00
95
COMPARISON RESULT
Core i5-9600K is the best overall choice
Core i5-9600K leads in overall performance, while Core i5-9600K offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Core i5-9600K leads in the combined performance index
Core i5-9600K costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
7Better
2
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
11Better
8
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
9Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
9Better
5
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
7Better
3
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date2018—
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark10706Better3816
PBP / MTP95 WBetter15 / 55 W
Cores / Threads6Better1P+4E / 6
SocketLGA1151v2LGA1700Better
ArchitectureCoffee Lake RefreshRaptor Lake Refresh
Clock speed3,7 - 4,6 GHzBetterP 1,2 - 2,2 GHz / E 0,9 - 1,6 GHz
Base clock3700 MHzBetter1200 MHz
Boost clock4600 MHzBetter2200 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-coreBetter
L2 cache256 KB per coreBetter2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache9 MBBetter8 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 630 1,15 GHzBetterUHD 64 1,1 GHz
Power consumption95 W15 / 55 WBetter
Process node14 nm10 nm (Intel 7)Better
Memory supportDDR4-2666 / DDR3-1866DDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200Better
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100773770%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100236117%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100361488%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100185113%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Core i5-9600K and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10051133%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1005286%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10041120%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10062100%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005286%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i5-9600K or Processor U301L?+
Core i5-9600K has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i5-9600K offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i5-9600K is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i5-9600K is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i5-9600K offers more overall performance, while Core i5-9600K offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i5-9600K is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i5-9600K is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i5-9600K leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i5-9600K can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i5-9600K is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i5-9600K is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i5-9600K is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i5-9600K if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.