H2H

Intel Core i7-13700K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235T

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i7-13700K outperforms Core Ultra 5 235T by 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+48%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i7-13700K vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235T: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T shows a 50% advantage for Core i7-13700K in gaming performance, while Core Ultra 5 235T may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
3020
Single-core
9083
Multi-core
5643
L3 cache
10
Efficiency
1522
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core i7-13700K is the best overall choice

Core i7-13700K leads in overall performance, while Core i7-13700K offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE35%

Core i7-13700K leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$189

Core i7-13700K costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i7-13700KCore Ultra 5 235T
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
30Better
20
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28Better
21
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26Better
18
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
15
22Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
27Better
20
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i7-13700KCore Ultra 5 235T
Release date20222024
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark46640Better31417
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WBetter65 / 114 W
Cores / Threads8P+8E / 24Better6P+8E / 14
SocketLGA1700LGA1851Better
ArchitectureRaptor LakeArrow Lake
Clock speedP 3,4 - 5,4 GHz / E 2,5 - 4,2 GHzBetterP 2,2 - 5 GHz / E 1,6 - 4,4 GHz
Base clock3400 MHzBetter2200 MHz
Boost clock5400 MHzBetter5000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core112 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-coreBetter
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster3 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterBetter
L3 cache30 MBBetter24 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 770 1,6 GHzBetterArc Xe2 24 2 GHz
Power consumption125 / 253 W65 / 114 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)3 nmBetter
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-6400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-13700KCore Ultra 5 235TDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10090838%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100564326%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100584917%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100453525%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 235T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-13700KCore Ultra 5 235TDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100211440%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100241640%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100181240%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100241640%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100231542%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i7-13700K27
Device BCore Ultra 5 235T20
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-13700K or Core Ultra 5 235T?

Core i7-13700K has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-13700K offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i7-13700K is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i7-13700K is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i7-13700K offers more overall performance, while Core i7-13700K offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i7-13700K is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i7-13700K is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i7-13700K leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-13700K can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i7-13700K is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i7-13700K is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i7-13700K is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i7-13700K if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.