H2H

Intel Core i7-14700 vs Intel Core i9-13900TE

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i7-14700 outperforms Core i9-13900TE by 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+226%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i7-14700 vs Intel Core i9-13900TE: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE shows a 230% advantage for Core i7-14700 in gaming performance, while Core i9-13900TE may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
3310
Single-core
9083
Multi-core
6670
L3 cache
11
Efficiency
1912
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core i7-14700 is the best overall choice

Core i7-14700 leads in overall performance, while Core i7-14700 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE200%

Core i7-14700 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$14

Core i7-14700 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i7-14700Core i9-13900TE
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33Better
10
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30Better
14
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28Better
11
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
19Better
12
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
30Better
10
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i7-14700Core i9-13900TE
Release date20232022
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark51516Better15819
PBP / MTP65 / 219 WBetter35 / 106 W
Cores / Threads8P+12E / 288P+16E / 32
Clock speedP 2,1 - 5,4 GHz / E 1,5 - 4,2 GHzBetterP 1 - 5 GHz / E 1 - 3,9 GHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1000 MHz
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshRaptor Lake
Boost clock5400 MHzBetter5000 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache33 MB36 MBBetter
Integrated graphicsUHD 770 1,6 GHzUHD 770 1,65 GHz
Power consumption65 / 219 W35 / 106 WBetter
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-14700Core i9-13900TEDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10090838%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10066706%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10063642%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10053566%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i7-14700 and Core i9-13900TE with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-14700Core i9-13900TEDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100237107%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100268106%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100196104%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100278109%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100258103%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i7-1470030
Device BCore i9-13900TE10
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-14700 or Core i9-13900TE?

Core i7-14700 has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-14700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i7-14700 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i7-14700 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i7-14700 offers more overall performance, while Core i7-14700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i7-14700 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i7-14700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i7-14700 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-14700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i7-14700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i7-14700 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i7-14700 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i7-14700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.