H2H

Intel Core i7-9700TE vs AMD A6-9400

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Core i7-9700TE outperforms A6-9400 by 459% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+459%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Core i7-9700TE vs AMD A6-9400: key takeaway

The comparison of Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 shows a 600% advantage for Core i7-9700TE in gaming performance, while A6-9400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
71
Single-core
6362
Multi-core
256
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
252
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Core i7-9700TE is the best overall choice

Core i7-9700TE leads in overall performance, while Core i7-9700TE offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE1000%

Core i7-9700TE leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$44

A6-9400 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryCore i7-9700TEA6-9400
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
7Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
11Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
9Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
25Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
11Better
1
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationCore i7-9700TEA6-9400
Release date20182016
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark10280Better1838
PBP / MTP35 W65 WBetter
Cores / Threads8Better2
SocketLGA1151v2BetterAM4
Clock speed1,8 - 3,8 GHz3,4 -3,7 GHzBetter
Base clock1800 MHz3400 MHzBetter
Boost clock3800 MHzBetter3700 MHz
L1 cache64 KB per core80 KB per moduleBetter
L2 cache256 KB per coreBetter1 MB per module
L3 cache12 MBBetter1 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 630 1,15 GHzBetterR5 1 GHz
Power consumption35 WBetter65 W
ArchitectureCoffee Lake RefreshBristol Ridge
Process node14 nmBetter28 nm
Memory supportDDR4-2666 / DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-9700TEA6-9400Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10063622%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100256123%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100332240%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100205120%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Core i7-9700TE and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexCore i7-9700TEA6-9400Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10051133%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10061143%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10041120%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10061143%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10051133%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ACore i7-9700TE11
Device BA6-94001
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-9700TE or A6-9400?

Core i7-9700TE has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-9700TE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i7-9700TE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i7-9700TE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i7-9700TE offers more overall performance, while Core i7-9700TE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i7-9700TE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i7-9700TE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i7-9700TE leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-9700TE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i7-9700TE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i7-9700TE is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i7-9700TE is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i7-9700TE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.