AMD
AMD PRO A10-8770 vs AMD A6-9400
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
A6-9400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗PRO A10-8770 outperforms A6-9400 by 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+101%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD PRO A10-8770 vs AMD A6-9400: key takeaway
The comparison of PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 shows a 100% advantage for PRO A10-8770 in gaming performance, while A6-9400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
21
6362
136
00
42
COMPARISON RESULT
PRO A10-8770 is the best overall choice
PRO A10-8770 leads in overall performance, while PRO A10-8770 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
PRO A10-8770 leads in the combined performance index
A6-9400 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
2Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
8Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
4Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
2Better
1
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date20152016
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark3697Better1838
PBP / MTP65 W65 W
Memory supportDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Cores / Threads4Better2
SocketAM4AM4
ArchitectureCarrizoBristol Ridge
Clock speed3,5 - 3,8 GHzBetter3,4 -3,7 GHz
Base clock3500 MHzBetter3400 MHz
Boost clock3800 MHzBetter3700 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per module80 KB per module
L2 cache1 MB per module1 MB per module
L3 cache2 MBBetter1 MB
Integrated graphicsR7 1 GHzBetterR5 1 GHz
Power consumption65 W65 W
Process node28 nm28 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10063622%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10013674%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100262217%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010567%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares PRO A10-8770 and A6-9400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: PRO A10-8770 or A6-9400?+
PRO A10-8770 has the higher overall gaming score, while PRO A10-8770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
PRO A10-8770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
PRO A10-8770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
PRO A10-8770 offers more overall performance, while PRO A10-8770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
PRO A10-8770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
PRO A10-8770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
PRO A10-8770 leads in combined 1440p performance. PRO A10-8770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
PRO A10-8770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
PRO A10-8770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
PRO A10-8770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to PRO A10-8770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.