H2H

AMD PRO A12-9800E vs AMD A6-9550

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

PRO A12-9800E outperforms A6-9550 by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+51%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

AMD PRO A12-9800E vs AMD A6-9550: key takeaway

The comparison of PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 shows a 100% advantage for PRO A12-9800E in gaming performance, while A6-9550 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
21
Single-core
6367
Multi-core
137
L3 cache
00
Efficiency
72
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

PRO A12-9800E is the best overall choice

PRO A12-9800E leads in overall performance, while PRO A12-9800E offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE200%

PRO A12-9800E leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$14

A6-9550 costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryPRO A12-9800EA6-9550
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
2Better
1
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
8Better
7
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
7Better
2
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
3Better
1
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationPRO A12-9800EA6-9550
Release date20162016
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark3429Better2268
PBP / MTP35 W65 WBetter
Memory supportDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Cores / Threads4Better2
SocketAM4AM4
ArchitectureBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Clock speed3,1 - 3,8 GHz3,8 - 4 GHzBetter
Base clock3100 MHz3800 MHzBetter
Boost clock3800 MHz4000 MHzBetter
L1 cache80 KB per module80 KB per module
L2 cache1 MB per module1 MB per module
L3 cache2 MBBetter1 MB
Integrated graphicsR7 0,9 GHzBetterR5 1 GHz
Power consumption35 WBetter65 W
Process node28 nm28 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexPRO A12-9800EA6-9550Difference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10063676%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10013760%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10026248%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010567%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares PRO A12-9800E and A6-9550 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexPRO A12-9800EA6-9550Difference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1002167%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1002167%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device APRO A12-9800E3
Device BA6-95501
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: PRO A12-9800E or A6-9550?

PRO A12-9800E has the higher overall gaming score, while PRO A12-9800E offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

PRO A12-9800E is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

PRO A12-9800E is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

PRO A12-9800E offers more overall performance, while PRO A12-9800E offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

PRO A12-9800E is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

PRO A12-9800E is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

PRO A12-9800E leads in combined 1440p performance. PRO A12-9800E can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

PRO A12-9800E is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

PRO A12-9800E is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

PRO A12-9800E is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to PRO A12-9800E if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.