AMD
AMD PRO A12-9800E vs Intel Processor U301L
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Processor U301L
Aggregate performance score
We've compared PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Processor U301L outperforms PRO A12-9800E by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD PRO A12-9800E vs Intel Processor U301L: key takeaway
The comparison of PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L shows a 0% advantage for PRO A12-9800E in gaming performance, while Processor U301L may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
22
6337
136
00
75
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
PRO A12-9800E leads in overall performance, while PRO A12-9800E offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Processor U301L costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
2
2
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
8
8
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
5
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
7Better
5
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
3
3
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date2016—
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark34293816Better
PBP / MTP35 WBetter15 / 55 W
Memory supportDDR4-2400DDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200Better
Cores / Threads4Better1P+4E / 6
SocketAM4LGA1700Better
ArchitectureBristol RidgeRaptor Lake Refresh
Clock speed3,1 - 3,8 GHzBetterP 1,2 - 2,2 GHz / E 0,9 - 1,6 GHz
Base clock3100 MHzBetter1200 MHz
Boost clock3800 MHzBetter2200 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per module80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache1 MB per module2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterBetter
L3 cache2 MB8 MBBetter
Integrated graphicsR7 0,9 GHzUHD 64 1,1 GHzBetter
Power consumption35 W15 / 55 WBetter
Process node28 nm10 nm (Intel 7)Better
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100633752%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10013674%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100261460%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010567%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares PRO A12-9800E and Processor U301L with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100220%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100220%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: PRO A12-9800E or Processor U301L?+
PRO A12-9800E has the higher overall gaming score, while PRO A12-9800E offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
PRO A12-9800E is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
PRO A12-9800E is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
PRO A12-9800E offers more overall performance, while PRO A12-9800E offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
PRO A12-9800E is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
PRO A12-9800E is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
PRO A12-9800E leads in combined 1440p performance. PRO A12-9800E can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
PRO A12-9800E is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
PRO A12-9800E is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
PRO A12-9800E is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to PRO A12-9800E if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.