Intel
Intel Processor 300 vs AMD PRO A8-9600
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
PRO A8-9600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Processor 300 outperforms PRO A8-9600 by 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+117%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Processor 300 vs AMD PRO A8-9600: key takeaway
The comparison of Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 shows a 150% advantage for Processor 300 in gaming performance, while PRO A8-9600 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
52
6557
711
00
144
COMPARISON RESULT
Processor 300 is the best overall choice
Processor 300 leads in overall performance, while Processor 300 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Processor 300 leads in the combined performance index
PRO A8-9600 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
5Better
2
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
10Better
8
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
8Better
5
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
14Better
4
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
7Better
2
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark7160Better3300
PBP / MTP46 W65 WBetter
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200BetterDDR4-2400
Cores / Threads2P / 44Better
SocketLGA1700BetterAM4
ArchitectureRaptor Lake RefreshBristol Ridge
Release date—2016
Clock speedP 3,9 GHzBetter3,1 - 3,4 GHz
Base clock3900 MHzBetter3100 MHz
Boost clock3900 MHzBetter3400 MHz
L1 cache80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core80 KB per module
L2 cache2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core clusterBetter1 MB per module
L3 cache6 MBBetter2 MB
Integrated graphicsUHD 710 1,45 GHzBetterR7 0,9 GHz
Power consumption46 WBetter65 W
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)Better28 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100655713%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10071144%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10023230%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 1005957%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Processor 300 and PRO A8-9600 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10041120%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1004267%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10031100%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1004267%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1004267%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Processor 300 or PRO A8-9600?+
Processor 300 has the higher overall gaming score, while Processor 300 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Processor 300 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Processor 300 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Processor 300 offers more overall performance, while Processor 300 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Processor 300 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Processor 300 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Processor 300 leads in combined 1440p performance. Processor 300 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Processor 300 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Processor 300 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Processor 300 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Processor 300 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.