AMD
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Intel Core 7 160UL
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Core 7 160UL
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 outperforms Core 7 160UL by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+22%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Intel Core 7 160UL: key takeaway
The comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL shows a 29% advantage for Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 in gaming performance, while Core 7 160UL may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
97
6587
2428
00
1716
COMPARISON RESULT
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the best overall choice
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 leads in the combined performance index
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
9Better
7
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
13Better
11
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
10Better
9
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
17Better
16
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
11Better
9
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date2018—
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark13512Better11043
PBP / MTP65 WBetter15 / 55 W
Memory supportDDR4-2933DDR5-5200 / DDR4-3200Better
Cores / Threads6 / 12Better2P+8E / 12
SocketAM4LGA1700Better
ArchitecturePinnacle RidgeRaptor Lake PS
Clock speed3,4 - 3,9 GHzBetterP 1,8 - 5,2 GHz / E 1,3 - 3,9 GHz
Base clock3400 MHzBetter1800 MHz
Boost clock3900 MHz5200 MHzBetter
L1 cache576 KBBetter80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache3 MBBetter2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache16 MBBetter12 MB
Power consumption65 W15 / 55 WBetter
Process node12 nm10 nm (Intel 7)Better
Integrated graphics—Iris Xe 96 1,3 GHz
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100658729%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100242815%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100334122%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100192215%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Core 7 160UL with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1006518%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1007615%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005422%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1007615%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1007533%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or Core 7 160UL?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.