AMD
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900 vs Intel Core i3-9100F
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Core i3-9100F
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Ryzen Threadripper 1900 outperforms Core i3-9100F by 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+112%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900 vs Intel Core i3-9100F: key takeaway
The comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F shows a 125% advantage for Ryzen Threadripper 1900 in gaming performance, while Core i3-9100F may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
94
6270
3014
00
98
COMPARISON RESULT
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is the best overall choice
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 leads in the combined performance index
Core i3-9100F costs less
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
9Better
4
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
13Better
9
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
10Better
7
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
9Better
8
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
9Better
5
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Release date20172018
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark14282Better6743
PBP / MTP125 WBetter65 W
Cores / Threads8 / 16Better4
SocketTR4LGA1151v2Better
ArchitectureWhitehavenCoffee Lake Refresh
Memory supportDDR4-2666 4 channelsDDR4-2400 / DDR3-1600
Clock speed3,1 - 3,7 GHz3,6 - 4,2 GHzBetter
Base clock3100 MHz3600 MHzBetter
Boost clock3700 MHz4200 MHzBetter
L1 cache96 KB per coreBetter64 KB per core
L2 cache512 KB per coreBetter256 KB per core
L3 cache16 MBBetter6 MB
Integrated graphicsNo—
Power consumption125 W65 WBetter
Process node14 nm14 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100627012%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100301473%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100352919%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100241174%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Ryzen Threadripper 1900 and Core i3-9100F with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1006367%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1007380%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005286%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1007380%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1007380%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen Threadripper 1900 or Core i3-9100F?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen Threadripper 1900 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen Threadripper 1900 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.