H2H

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+100%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: key takeaway

The comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X shows a 100% advantage for Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX in gaming performance, while Ryzen Threadripper 1900X may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
2211
Single-core
7267
Multi-core
5233
L3 cache
10
Efficiency
108
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the best overall choice

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX leads in overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE90%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$290

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXRyzen Threadripper 1900X
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
22Better
11
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
22Better
14
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
20Better
12
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
10Better
8
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
19Better
10
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXRyzen Threadripper 1900X
Release date20192017
Device classServerDesktop
PassMark33514Better16792
PBP / MTP280 WBetter180 W
Cores / Threads12 / 24Better8 / 16
SocketsWRX8BetterTR4
ArchitectureCastle PeakWhitehaven
Clock speed4 - 4,3 GHzBetter3,8 - 4 GHz
Base clock4000 MHzBetter3800 MHz
Boost clock4300 MHzBetter4000 MHz
L1 cache768 KB768 KB
L2 cache6 MBBetter4 MB
L3 cache64 MBBetter16 MB
Integrated graphicsNoNo
Power consumption280 W180 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter14 nm
Memory supportDDR4-3200 8 channelsDDR4-2666 4 channels
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXRyzen Threadripper 1900XDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10072677%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100523345%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100513829%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100422647%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WXRyzen Threadripper 1900XDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10016867%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10017962%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10013760%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10018967%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10017872%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX19
Device BRyzen Threadripper 1900X10
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX or Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers more overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.