H2H

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX vs Intel Core i9-13900T

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX outperforms Core i9-13900T by 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+212%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX vs Intel Core i9-13900T: key takeaway

The comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T shows a 207% advantage for Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX in gaming performance, while Core i9-13900T may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
Performance
8929
Single-core
8588
Multi-core
10074
L3 cache
51
Efficiency
3234
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the best overall choice

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX leads in overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE153%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$3,274

Core i9-13900T costs less

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WXCore i9-13900T
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
89Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
70Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
68Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
32
34Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
30
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WXCore i9-13900T
Release date20222022
Device classServerDesktop
PassMark137139Better44015
SocketsTR5LGA1700Better
PBP / MTP350 WBetter35 / 106 W
Boost clock5100 MHz5300 MHzBetter
Integrated graphicsNoUHD 770 1,65 GHz
Cores / Threads64 / 128Better8P+16E / 32
ArchitectureStorm PeakRaptor Lake
Clock speed3,2 - 5,1 GHzBetterP 1,1 - 5,3 GHz / E 0,8 - 3,9 GHz
Base clock3200 MHzBetter1100 MHz
L1 cache4096 KBBetter80 KB per P-core, 96 KB per E-core
L2 cache64 MBBetter2 MB per P-core, 4 MB per E-core cluster
L3 cache256 MBBetter36 MB
Power consumption350 W35 / 106 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter10 nm (Intel 7)
Memory supportDDR5-5200 8 channelsDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WXCore i9-13900TDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10085883%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 1001007430%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100816719%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100816030%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Core i9-13900T with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WXCore i9-13900TDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 1006421101%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 1007023101%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 1005417104%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 1007223103%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 1006822102%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX76
Device BCore i9-13900T30
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX or Core i9-13900T?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers more overall performance, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.