Intel Arc A770VSRadeon RX 7400
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A770+38%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A770
VSWINNERArc A77032%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 7400
Performance5540
Efficiency81100
Price / performance10088
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Intel Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 7400: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A770 and RX 7400 shows a 38% advantage for Arc A770 in gaming performance, while RX 7400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5540
81100
10088
8868
COMPARISON RESULT
Arc A770 is the best overall choice
Arc A770 leads in combined game performance. Arc A770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Arc A770 leads in the combined performance index
Arc A770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 30–35of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770
100/100 · Price $329The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
69Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.03x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1a
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS19.66Better8
Power consumption225 W55 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pin1x 6-pin
Memory cacheL2 16 MBBetterL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHzBetter1452 - 2300 MHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter2300 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter10,8 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter173 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
Release date20222025
ArchitectureXe-HPGRDNA 3.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$329$299Better
Shader units / cores4096Better1792
Power consumption225 W55 WBetter
Process node6 nm6 nm
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Die size406 mm²204 mm²Better
Transistor count21700 millionBetter13300 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A770RX 7400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
27 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
23 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
17 FPSEstimated 66%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong27Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone27Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2228Estimated 74%197Estimated 74%160Estimated 74%139Estimated 74%125Estimated 74%85Estimated 69%62Estimated 74%27Estimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077147Estimated 74%127Estimated 74%127Estimated 74%110Estimated 74%90Estimated 74%62Estimated 69%42Estimated 74%18Estimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5186Estimated 80%161Estimated 80%120Estimated 74%104Estimated 74%112Estimated 74%77Estimated 69%91Estimated 74%40Estimated 63%
God of War Ragnarök27Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy120Estimated 74%104Estimated 74%101Estimated 74%87Estimated 74%81Estimated 74%55Estimated 69%42Estimated 74%18Estimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202427Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds27Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Starfield27Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%20Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%12Estimated 61%10Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100554032%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100645025%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100644829%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008110021%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100705328%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100685129%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100644829%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100735626%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100654830%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGRDNA 3.0
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date20222025
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count21700 millionBetter13300 million
Die size406 mm²204 mm²Better
Shader units / cores4096Better1792
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter2300 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x8
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin1x 6-pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1a
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.03x DisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A770 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS19.66Better8
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or RX 7400?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.