Intel Arc B570VSIntel Arc A750
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A750+9%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc B570
VSWINNERArc A7508%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A750
Performance4751
Efficiency10076
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Intel Arc B570 vs Intel Arc A750: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc B570 and Arc A750 shows a 9% advantage for Arc A750 in gaming performance, while Arc B570 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4751
10076
100100
7468
COMPARISON RESULT
Arc B570 is the best overall choice
Arc B570 leads in combined game performance. Arc B570 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Arc B570 leads in the combined performance index
Arc A750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 37–42of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc B570
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc B570
100/100 · Price $219The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47
51Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
43Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
38
41Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
76
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
65
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingXeSSXeSS
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS11.5217.2Better
Power consumption150 WBetter225 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Release date20252022
ArchitectureXe2-HPGXe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$219Better$289
Shader units / cores23043584Better
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Clock speed2500 - 2500 MHzBetter2050 - 2400 MHz
Base clock2500 MHzBetter2050 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter2400 MHz
VRAM10 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency19 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus160 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth380 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
Power consumption150 WBetter225 W
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Recommended PSU450 WBetter550 W
Length272 mmVaries by board
Die size272 mm²Better406 mm²
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 18 MBL2 16 MBBetter
Transistor count19600 million21700 millionBetter
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B570Arc A750
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
25 FPSEstimated 66%
26 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
16 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
7 FPSEstimated 60%
8 FPSEstimated 61%
Black Myth: Wukong25Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
Call of Duty: Warzone25Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
Counter-Strike 2208Estimated 74%221Estimated 74%146Estimated 74%156Estimated 74%114Estimated 74%121Estimated 74%41Estimated 68%47Estimated 69%
Cyberpunk 2077134Estimated 74%143Estimated 74%116Estimated 74%123Estimated 74%82Estimated 74%88Estimated 74%28Estimated 68%32Estimated 69%
Forza Horizon 5169Estimated 80%180Estimated 80%110Estimated 74%117Estimated 74%102Estimated 74%109Estimated 74%61Estimated 68%69Estimated 69%
God of War Ragnarök25Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
Hogwarts Legacy110Estimated 74%117Estimated 74%92Estimated 74%98Estimated 74%74Estimated 74%79Estimated 74%28Estimated 68%32Estimated 69%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202425Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
Monster Hunter Wilds25Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
Starfield25Estimated 66%26Estimated 66%21Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%16Estimated 66%17Estimated 66%7Estimated 60%8Estimated 61%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10047518%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10057582%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10055562%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10074688%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007627%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10059590%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10058580%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10055562%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10062603%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10055562%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe2-HPGXe-HPG
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20252022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count19600 million21700 millionBetter
Die size272 mm²Better406 mm²
Shader units / cores23043584Better
Base clock2500 MHzBetter2050 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter2400 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length272 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 WBetter550 W
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc B570 and Arc A750 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM10 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus160 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS11.5217.2Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIA
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B570 or Arc A750?+
Arc B570 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc B570 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc B570 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B570 offers more overall performance, while Arc B570 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc B570 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B570 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B570 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B570 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B570 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.