Intel Arc B770VSGeForce RTX 4080
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 4080+20%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc B770
VSWINNERRTX 408018%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 4080
Performance6072
Efficiency8975
Price / performance10074
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Intel Arc B770 vs GeForce RTX 4080: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc B770 and RTX 4080 shows a 20% advantage for RTX 4080 in gaming performance, while Arc B770 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6072
8975
10074
8888
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Arc B770 leads in combined game performance. Arc B770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc B770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 14–19of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc B770
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc B770
100/100 · Price $549The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60
72Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50
58Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47
56Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
89Better
75
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73
73
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
HDMIHDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
TFLOPS2848.74Better
USB Type-CNoNo
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Power consumption225 WBetter320 W
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Recommended PSUVaries by board700 W
LengthVaries by board310 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardTriple-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedAda Lovelace
Transistor countNot publicly specified45900 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified379 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified9728
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL1 128 KB, L2 64 MB
Launch price—$1199
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHz2205 - 2505 MHzBetter
Base clock2100 MHz2205 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2505 MHzBetter
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6X
Memory frequency16 GHz22,4 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s717 GB/sBetter
Power connector6+8 pin16 pin
Release date20262022
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption225 WBetter320 W
Process node5 nm5 nm
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B770RTX 4080
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
29 FPSEstimated 66%
35 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
25 FPSEstimated 66%
30 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 66%
13 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: Wukong29Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Call of Duty: Warzone29Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2248Estimated 74%297Estimated 74%174Estimated 74%209Estimated 74%135Estimated 74%162Estimated 74%67Estimated 74%81Estimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077160Estimated 74%192Estimated 74%138Estimated 74%165Estimated 74%98Estimated 74%118Estimated 74%45Estimated 74%54Estimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5202Estimated 80%242Estimated 80%131Estimated 74%156Estimated 74%122Estimated 74%146Estimated 74%99Estimated 74%119Estimated 74%
God of War Ragnarök29Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Hogwarts Legacy131Estimated 74%156Estimated 74%109Estimated 74%131Estimated 74%88Estimated 74%105Estimated 74%46Estimated 74%55Estimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202429Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Monster Hunter Wilds29Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
Starfield29Estimated 66%35Estimated 66%25Estimated 66%30Estimated 66%19Estimated 66%23Estimated 66%11Estimated 66%13Estimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100607218%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100677613%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100687611%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100897517%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10073798%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071789%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100687611%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075818%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100687712%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedAda Lovelace
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date20262022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor countNot publicly specified45900 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified379 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified9728
Base clock2100 MHz2205 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2505 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board310 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardTriple-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board700 W
Power connector6+8 pin16 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc B770 and RTX 4080 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS2848.74Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B770 or RTX 4080?+
Arc B770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B770 offers more overall performance, while Arc B770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.