Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxVSRadeon RX 6400
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx+33%Better gaming performance
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
VSWINNERNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx29%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 6400
Performance4433
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx vs Radeon RX 6400: key takeaway
The comparison of Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 shows a 33% advantage for Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx in gaming performance, while RX 6400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
4433
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined game performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 56–61of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.2
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by board250 W
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 2.0
Transistor countNot publicly specified5400 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified107 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified768
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL1 128 KB, L2 1 MB
Power consumption—53 W
TFLOPS0.563.565Better
VRAM- SMA4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory frequency—16 GHz
Memory bus—64 bit
Memory bandwidth—128 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x4
Power connector—None
Power consumption—53 W
Release date20222022
Launch price—$159
Clock speed400 - 2200 MHz1923 - 2321 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz1923 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Process node6 nm6 nm
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxRX 6400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong22Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone22Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2182Estimated 74%168Estimated 72%128Estimated 74%118Estimated 72%99Estimated 74%63Estimated 66%49Estimated 74%23Estimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077117Estimated 74%109Estimated 72%101Estimated 74%93Estimated 72%72Estimated 74%46Estimated 66%33Estimated 74%15Estimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5148Estimated 80%137Estimated 78%96Estimated 74%88Estimated 72%89Estimated 74%57Estimated 66%72Estimated 74%33Estimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök22Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy96Estimated 74%89Estimated 72%80Estimated 74%74Estimated 72%64Estimated 74%41Estimated 66%34Estimated 74%16Estimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202422Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds22Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
Starfield22Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%18Estimated 66%17Estimated 64%14Estimated 66%9Estimated 58%8Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443329%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100494411%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10044452%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10044489%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 2.0
Process node6 nm6 nm
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor countNot publicly specified5400 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified107 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified768
Base clock400 MHz1923 MHzBetter
Boost clock2200 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x4
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board250 W
Power connector—None
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM- SMA4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus—64 bit
TFLOPS0.563.565Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx or RX 6400?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx has the higher overall gaming score, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more overall performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx leads in combined 1440p performance. Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.