GeForce RTX 3050 6 GBVSIntel Arc A380
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB+8%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 6 GB
VSWINNERRTX 3050 6 GB8%Better gaming performance
Intel
Arc A380
Performance3936
Efficiency100100
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Intel Arc A380: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 shows a 8% advantage for RTX 3050 6 GB in gaming performance, while Arc A380 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3936
100100
100100
6060
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 3050 6 GB is the best overall choice
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in the combined performance index
Arc A380 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 47–52of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
100/100 · Price $139The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.0
TFLOPS6.774Better4.198
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power consumption70 WBetter75 W
Power connectorNone6 pin
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
Release date20242022
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$229$139Better
Shader units / cores2304Better1024
Clock speed1042 - 1470 MHzBetter300 - 2000 MHz
Base clock1042 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1470 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency14 GHz15,5 GHzBetter
Memory bus96 bit96 bit
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s186 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power consumption70 WBetter75 W
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Length242 mm222 mmBetter
Die size200 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count8700 millionBetter7200 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3050 6 GBArc A380
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 65%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
10 FPSEstimated 59%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong24Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone24Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2206Estimated 74%188Estimated 74%140Estimated 73%129Estimated 74%74Estimated 66%69Estimated 67%25Estimated 62%23Estimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077133Estimated 74%121Estimated 74%111Estimated 73%102Estimated 74%54Estimated 66%50Estimated 67%17Estimated 62%15Estimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5167Estimated 80%153Estimated 80%105Estimated 73%97Estimated 74%67Estimated 66%62Estimated 67%37Estimated 62%34Estimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök24Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy108Estimated 74%99Estimated 74%88Estimated 73%81Estimated 74%48Estimated 66%45Estimated 67%17Estimated 62%16Estimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202424Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds24Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Starfield24Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%20Estimated 65%19Estimated 66%10Estimated 58%10Estimated 59%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039368%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049474%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048464%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051494%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20242022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count8700 millionBetter7200 million
Die size200 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better1024
Base clock1042 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1470 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length242 mm222 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Power connectorNone6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus96 bit96 bit
TFLOPS6.774Better4.198
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 6 GB or Arc A380?+
RTX 3050 6 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3050 6 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 6 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.