GeForce RTX 3050 6 GBVSRadeon RX 6400
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 3050 6 GB+18%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 6 GB
VSWINNERRTX 3050 6 GB17%Better gaming performance
AMD
RX 6400
Performance3933
Efficiency100100
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon RX 6400: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 shows a 18% advantage for RTX 3050 6 GB in gaming performance, while RX 6400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3933
100100
100100
6060
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 3050 6 GB is the best overall choice
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in the combined performance index
RX 6400 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 47–52of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 6400
100/100 · Price $159The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.4a
TFLOPS6.774Better3.565
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power consumption70 W53 WBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
Release date20242022
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2.0
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$229$159Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Clock speed1042 - 1470 MHz1923 - 2321 MHzBetter
Base clock1042 MHz1923 MHzBetter
Boost clock1470 MHz2321 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency14 GHz16 GHzBetter
Memory bus96 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sBetter128 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x4
Power consumption70 W53 WBetter
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Length242 mmVaries by board
Die size200 mm²107 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count8700 millionBetter5400 million
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3050 6 GBRX 6400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 65%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: Wukong24Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Call of Duty: Warzone24Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2206Estimated 74%168Estimated 72%140Estimated 73%118Estimated 72%74Estimated 66%63Estimated 66%25Estimated 62%23Estimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077133Estimated 74%109Estimated 72%111Estimated 73%93Estimated 72%54Estimated 66%46Estimated 66%17Estimated 62%15Estimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5167Estimated 80%137Estimated 78%105Estimated 73%88Estimated 72%67Estimated 66%57Estimated 66%37Estimated 62%33Estimated 62%
God of War Ragnarök24Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Hogwarts Legacy108Estimated 74%89Estimated 72%88Estimated 73%74Estimated 72%48Estimated 66%41Estimated 66%17Estimated 62%16Estimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202424Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Monster Hunter Wilds24Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
Starfield24Estimated 66%20Estimated 64%20Estimated 65%17Estimated 64%10Estimated 58%9Estimated 58%5Estimated 55%5Estimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393317%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049459%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051486%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAmpereRDNA 2.0
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20242022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count8700 millionBetter5400 million
Die size200 mm²107 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Base clock1042 MHz1923 MHzBetter
Boost clock1470 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x4
Length242 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU250 W250 W
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and RX 6400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus96 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS6.774Better3.565
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 6 GB or RX 6400?+
RTX 3050 6 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3050 6 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 6 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.