GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBVSRadeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 3050 8 GB+1%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 3050 8 GB
VSWINNERRTX 3050 8 GB0%Better gaming performance
AMD
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Performance4444
Price / performance100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx shows a 0% advantage for RTX 3050 8 GB in gaming performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
4444
100100
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 3050 8 GB is the best overall choice
RTX 3050 8 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3050 8 GB leads in the combined performance index
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 42–47of 61
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS9.098Better0.56
Power consumption130 W—
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power connector8 pin—
Release date20222022
ArchitectureAmpereNot publicly specified
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$299—
Shader units / cores2560Not publicly specified
Length242 mmVaries by board
Clock speed1552 - 1777 MHzBetter400 - 2200 MHz
Base clock1552 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1777 MHz2200 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency14 GHz—
Memory bus128 bit—
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Power consumption130 W—
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Die size276 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count12000 millionNot publicly specified
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3050 8 GBNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 63%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: Wukong26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Call of Duty: Warzone26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2215Estimated 74%182Estimated 74%151Estimated 74%128Estimated 74%101Estimated 71%99Estimated 74%29Estimated 63%49Estimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077139Estimated 74%117Estimated 74%120Estimated 74%101Estimated 74%73Estimated 71%72Estimated 74%20Estimated 63%33Estimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5175Estimated 80%148Estimated 80%114Estimated 74%96Estimated 74%91Estimated 71%89Estimated 74%43Estimated 63%72Estimated 74%
God of War Ragnarök26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Hogwarts Legacy114Estimated 74%96Estimated 74%95Estimated 74%80Estimated 74%65Estimated 71%64Estimated 74%20Estimated 63%34Estimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 202426Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Monster Hunter Wilds26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
Starfield26Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%22Estimated 66%18Estimated 66%14Estimated 63%14Estimated 66%5Estimated 55%8Estimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10050492%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100680200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554422%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544420%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100574426%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAmpereNot publicly specified
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count12000 millionNot publicly specified
Die size276 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Not publicly specified
Base clock1552 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1777 MHz2200 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Length242 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU300 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM8 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus128 bit—
TFLOPS9.098Better0.56
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 8 GB or Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx?+
RTX 3050 8 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3050 8 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 8 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3050 8 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 8 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 8 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 8 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.